Top 8 Fuels of the Future

TrackBacks (0) Comments (8)

By Trevor Curwin, SCIFI.com

Renewable energy is still just a small part of the of our overall energy use. While it's growing steadily, we're going to need alternatives if we hope to reduce our dependency on oil, and the carbon-dioxide it chugs into the atmosphere when we burn it. Luckily, brainiacs in labs around the world are finding even more efficient ways to produce energy from what's readily available and not buried beneath megatons of earthly crust.

Here's a look at eight different ways you may be tanking up at home and on the road in the near and distant future.

top_8_alt_fuels.jpg

1. Hydrogen
Like the new BMW TV ads say, their still-unavailable Hydrogen 7 is "ready for the world… when the world is ready." But progress on California's "hydrogen highway" hasn't quite hit the numbers supporters hoped it would. Fuel-cell technology has alternately been a darling of Wall Street and Detroit for almost a decade now, but we've yet to see many hydrogen-powered vehicles in the wild. The technology seems like an environmentalist's wet dream (literally), with hydrogen bonding with oxygen to produce power and water — and no greenhouse-gas emissions to speak of. But building a new series of hydrogen power stations hasn't been as easy as once thought, and people still think "Hindenberg" when they think "hydrogen," although it seems to be a safe enough technology that transit authorities uses hundreds of hydrogen-powered buses to move us around urban centers. Still, hydrogen's ultimate downfall may be battery technologies and other clean fuels that could overtake it before it has the chance to get wide adoption.

2. Biofuels
This is a fractious bunch of youngsters, with fraternal twins biodiesel and corn-based ethanol trying to keep its younger sibling — cellulosic ethanol — from hogging the family photos. Enormous amounts of capital have flowed into developing both biodiesel (Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen is funding the biggest biodiesel refinery in the country in Washington State) and corn-based ethanol (Sun Microsystems founder and venture capital Vinod Khosla has made big bets in this space). Converting vehicles and power plants to these renewable fuels that act and burn like fossil fuels has certainly made much headway. Heck, you could be burning an ethanol blend in your car right now and not even know it, and installing conversion kits for biodiesel makes putting on new spinning rims look tough.

3. Solar
Solar is probably the sexiest of the renewables, what with its black shiny arrays, tilting half-interested at Old Sol. Between tax breaks to install solar panels and new sleeker technology that makes your neighbors want to say "cool roof, man," solar is beginning to take off. Thin-film technology — allowing you to bend the silicon components into more flexible shapes — and increases in solar-cell efficiency mean you can install solar in the Northeast more viably. And momentum is there among legislators as well. In Colorado, the state has passed a "renewable portfolio standard," meaning that not only do utilities need to produce a great deal of renewable energy in the coming decades or face penalties, but they also have to buy a portion of that renewable energy from its customers with solar roofs.

4. Wind
Windmills have come a long way from Kansas farm country and being Don Quixote's nemesis. Wind power first took off — as did many renewable energy sources — in the late '70s and early '80s with the last spike in the price of oil. But after that it stalled until fairly recently. With many states forcing utilities into renewable energy production, this has spurred great technological advances in wind power, and now wind projects are installed or planned in almost every state. The era of having your own windmill, and going "off the grid," is also back, with personal household models costing under $20,000, assuming you have forgiving neighbors. And efficiencies in technology mean you don't need a hurricane to generate a lot of power. But wind's popularity has also created a bottleneck — estimates are that you'll be waiting longer for a wind turbine (about 18 months) than you will for a black Prius.

5. Batteries
They're not really a fuel, but they're the "universal solvent" to our current rate of use of fossil fuels. Technically, we still burn more dinosaur soup making electricity for buildings than on the road, but all those cars and trucks we sit in use energy in other ways, too. They require gas stations everywhere, and that means yet more trucks to haul three grades of gas and Cinnabons to highway rest stops across the country. But new battery technology will last longer and charge more quickly, making it possible to burn the right fuel in the right place, rather than transporting the wrong fuel all over the place. So maybe as you drive from Seattle to Boston, you'll top up your electric or hybrid car with tidal power in Seattle, wind power in Colorado, cellulosic ethanol in Nebraska, biogasoline in Illinois and biomass to carry you into Boston.

6. Tides
Think about how it feels to have someone chucking a bucket of water in your face, then multiply that by several hundred million, and you get an idea of the energy going untapped around our coastlines every day. Test facilities for harnessing tidal power in Canada's Bay of Fundy have been around since the '70s, and San Francisco will be putting in a high-tech tidal plant at the Golden Gate soon. There are certainly environmental concerns around tidal power, since these projects usually involve some kind of plant at the narrow mouth of a bay or inlet, where the water is moving fastest and most violently, meaning it's not so great for the fish or birds nearby. But the future of ocean power is wave technology, where floating platforms and buoys, dozens of miles offshore, harvest the energy of wave motion. Think of an upside-down yo-yo, except your finger is an anchor at the bottom of the ocean, and the spinning spool floats on the surface. As each wave passes, the yo-yo gets pulled up, and pulls your finger… or a turbine.

7. Garbage
Meet the newest member of the energy family: last year's trash. While incinerators haven't really been widespread since the '60s because of pollution concerns, companies like American Combustion are working on the next generation of burning, like their PyreJet. It combines a long-range supersonic oxygen jet and focused carbon injection — essentially a jet engine — to reduce last night's Dominos, a year's worth of Sports Illustrateds you didn't get a chance to read and that old blow-up doll into valuable energy for everyone. Now there's always an answer to, "Who would want that?" when you're at someone else's house.

8. Nuclear Fusion
Like that kid in eighth grade who tried to be really cool but annoyed everyone, the nuclear industry has been talking a lot lately, telling everyone at recess about how their emissions "carbon-free." True, but wind power doesn't need to go around the lunchroom calling itself "plutonium-239-free," so quit being a punk or I'll be seeing you after school by the monkey bars at Three Mile Island, and don't tell your homeroom teacher. But if the opposite of hate is love, then the opposite of fission is fusion, and while it's not exactly around the corner, it holds out a lot of promise. Yes, it's the energy choice of the Sun itself, but simply put, in fusion, two lighter atomic nuclei fuse together to form a heavier nucleus. In doing so, it releases a few megatons of energy, ideally producing a waste product more benign, though not harmless, compared to its fissile brother. A European test plant managed to produce an output of 16 megawatts of electricity using fusion (about as much as a coal plant), but only for a few seconds. New test facilities are planned, so who knows? The atom may be our pal after all.

Trevor Curwin
SCIFI.com

Comments

8 Comments

Susie Hammer on November 26, 2007 7:50 AM

#9 should be sugar. They have been using sugar for fuel in South America for years. The History channel had a whole program on it. It's cheap and pollution free. 90 cents a gallon sure beats $3.35 a gallon and the Co-2 released is next to nothing.

Tidal power has been around for thousands of years. Long ago, as tides rose, the water was trapped behind gates and as the tides receded the water, penned up behind gates, trickled back to the sea through various openings, powering things like sawmills.

Of course the problem with biofuels and ethanol is that to produce such fuels, fossil fuels are used. As a result, these green fuels may not be as green as everyone is told.

Fusion is a great concept, but the problem with it is the same as fission; generating massive amounts of energy at once is a bad idea. Wind and solar alternatives can easily comprise the energy needs. There are other ideas out there, such as algae energy producing spires, that need to be developed and rest assured this needs to be done by private companies and firms as the government is quite happy as to the methods with which they are making money.

Ultra Sound Shirts on June 17, 2008 11:39 AM

What about that man from Florida who is running his car on water?

decembermoon on June 17, 2008 12:45 PM

what about compressed air? the air car is already in production in europe and soon to be here in the US...

Larry Lapel on June 17, 2008 1:16 PM

Hello
We will be moving soon to Virginia, I would like to know if we can use Solar Power. We are build-
ing a 1362 sq. ft. home. Any thing you can send
us will be a big help.
I'm 72 years old and as my wife would say, it not nice to tell a ladys age. We had hope to stay in
are home in Brooksville Fl. but it was not to be.
This is a big move for us we are on a set income
and we are looking for the wise way to use are
money and we fell it would pay for it's self.
Thank You
Larry and Linda Lapel

Heck I just watch people race their engines to get to the red light WE can see in the distance, Me, just like to keep moving so try to time the lights. Living in a city of over a million people I can still go most places I want and hit almost every red light. If there is a traffic tie-up on a major road I use, I stop at a cafefor a coffee maybe a snack and read the paper, then when I do decide to go there is very little traffic and I cruse along at any speed I desire.
I also start work at different time to avoid the 4:25 pm crunch. If all companies would ask employees if they want to start a few minutes earlier or later it would move the 4:30 pm rush our around a bit and not have as many vehicles on the road all at one time. On occasssion I have stayed a few minutes later chatting with other employees and when we hit the road we found a 20 minute chat helped us arrive home within 3 or 4 minutes of the time we would have anyways if we had tried to FFIGHT the traffic.
Stop and go traffic is a real gas guzzzzzzler. Har v

Geanine H on June 17, 2008 5:29 PM

Bio-fuels are the worst option, nearly as bad as petroleum. For these 3 reasons:
1- We already have world-wide famine, why would we put product that could feed the hungry and save lives into our gas tanks? selfish & wasteful.
2- More evergy is used up in the planting, watering, treating and harvesting processes, than is produced into useable fuel sources. Why waste energy, and further pollute this planet?
3- PESTIDICES, HERBICIDES, obviously more of these deadly toxins are going to be required in order to grow HUGE mono-cultures. MIght I remind you that almost all types of pestidices are cronically toxic. AKA they cause cancer!
if you do not believe me, research it and think for yourself, don't just believe it is good because people say it's good. If you buy their product, they make money. Money makes the world go around, so spend it wisely.

im very happy to see that somfin is being done about the environment i dont vote in my own area coz there is no green party. i wil love it if more ppl could contribute. i would for defos.

Leave a comment